Repositório Colecção:http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/242026-05-03T08:24:58Z2026-05-03T08:24:58ZExecução em face da fazenda pública: sequestro de verbas com destinação específica no estado do Rio Grande do Nortehttp://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/12972025-12-09T14:44:46Z2018-01-01T00:00:00ZTítulo: Execução em face da fazenda pública: sequestro de verbas com destinação específica no estado do Rio Grande do Norte
Resumo: The objective of this study was to analyze the block of funds destined to health
and education, for the payment of government debt. It demonstrates the possibility of
manage public fund, such as Rio Grande do Norte Court of Justice, which is not a process
of calculating a number referring to amounts of related funds. In order to obtain the result,
the most theoretical model was defined, of an exploratory nature that allows the use of
tools for the viability of a series of exercises, accumulated along several government debt
management. The results shows there are grounds justifying the construction of block
funds, but it is possible that there was a loss of performance due to the permissibility of
the Municipal Participation Fund, which authorizes the conditional delivery of resources
Union to the lifting of their credentials, or their local authorities, with the Municipalities,
ensuring compliance with the obligation.
Type: Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso2018-01-01T00:00:00ZA arbitragem como instrumento de regulação do comércio internacional: um estudo de caso da arbitragem marítima de Singapura á luz da teoria do direito e desenvolvimentohttp://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/12962025-12-09T14:41:40Z2018-01-01T00:00:00ZTítulo: A arbitragem como instrumento de regulação do comércio internacional: um estudo de caso da arbitragem marítima de Singapura á luz da teoria do direito e desenvolvimento
Resumo: Development is a topic that is very much discussed at the present time,
including by Administrative Law, more precisely in relation to the performance of the
regulatory State. Thus, to better study the role of the regulatory state in promoting
national development was used the theory of law and development, which states that
legal institutes influence the development process of countries. Such a theory still
does not enjoy methodological autonomy, and more empirical research is needed to
validate its models. In this sense, the present monograph has as its proposal a brief
analysis of the experience of using the legal institute of arbitration specialized in
Maritime Law as a tool for regulating international trade in Singapore. With regard to
the specific objectives to be achieved, it is possible to identify: the understanding of
the legal elements determining the development of international trade, the
identification of the international regulatory framework for this sector, and the impact
of normative regulation of maritime arbitration on international trade in Singapore.
The methodology used was qualitative in which documentary and bibliographic
research techniques were used. Regarding the result, it was verified, among other
aspects, that the legal institute of arbitration has a strategic role in the development
of economic policies focused on international trade.
Type: Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso2018-01-01T00:00:00ZResponsabilidade civil do estado na promoção do direito fundamental à saúdehttp://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/12952025-12-09T13:58:39Z2018-01-01T00:00:00ZTítulo: Responsabilidade civil do estado na promoção do direito fundamental à saúde
Resumo: Analyzes the liability of the State in health, highlighting the difficulties
encountered and the damage suffered by users of the basic health system, arising
from acts commissives and omissive charged by the state and its consequences for
both the individual and the public entity responsible. It emphasizes the fundamental
right to health, such as the State's duty, which is realized through the national health
care system. Fans are circumstances in which the state is civilly liable for damage
caused to users of that system, which occur because of flaws in its operation through
the analysis of jurisprudence and public civil action filed by the Prosecutor.
Type: Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso2018-01-01T00:00:00ZA responsabilidade civil do estado pelos atos do poder judiciáriohttp://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/12942025-12-09T13:47:06Z2018-01-01T00:00:00ZTítulo: A responsabilidade civil do estado pelos atos do poder judiciário
Resumo: The civil responsibility of the State for the activity of the judiciary is a very
controversial subject that provides innumerable positions. In this vision, the objective
of this monograph is to analyze if the State can be civilly responsible for the acts of
the judicial activity to the mold of the general rule. For that, a doctrinal, legislative and
jurisprudential research was done to substantiate the present achievement. Initially, it
was tried to weave a theoretical framework to approach this theme, with the survey of
the history evolution of the civil responsibility of the State, the development of this in
the mother country legislation, especially the art. 37, § 6, of the Federal Constitution,
as well as highlighting the general elements of responsibility. Entering the
responsibility of the Judge State, the theory of irresponsibility of the jurisdictional acts
and the arguments against this understanding were analyzed in the first moment. In
addition, by entering into the aspects of judicial activity, judicial proceedings were
distinguished from the judicial ones, elucidating that the former are predominantly
administrative activities and thus constitute an objective responsibility by application
of the general rule of state responsibility, being divergent the positioning of
responsibility in the judicial acts. Regarding jurisdictional acts, the harmful activity
may be due to both a commissive and omissive act, which would be the delay in
rendering the judicial activity. In this context, the more traditional doctrine and the
Federal Supreme Court, followed by other courts, defend the impossibility of
objective liability in the hypothesis of damage caused in the exercise of judicial
activity, excepting cases provided by law such as judicial error and arrest beyond the
time of condemnation. In all other cases, it defends a subjective responsibility linked
to fraud, fraud or the fault of the magistrate. On the other hand, the most current
doctrine has assigned greater responsibility to the State, in the form of civil liability
applied to private entities.
Type: Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso2018-01-01T00:00:00Z