<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/23">
    <title>Repositório Colecção:</title>
    <link>http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/23</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/913" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/142" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1486" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1192" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-08-18T00:12:03Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/913">
    <title>Métodos autocompositivos de resolução de conflitos no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro: evolução e considerações sobre o caráter obrigatório da audiência preliminar de conciliação e mediação prevista no CPC/2015</title>
    <link>http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/913</link>
    <description>Título: Métodos autocompositivos de resolução de conflitos no ordenamento jurídico brasileiro: evolução e considerações sobre o caráter obrigatório da audiência preliminar de conciliação e mediação prevista no CPC/2015
Resumo: Although not a recent phenomenon in Brazilian law, collaborative methods of conflict resolution have undergone significant evolution since 2015, as a result of the promulgation of the “Resolution no. 125 of the CNJ”, the “Mediation Law” and, above all, the “2015 Civil Procedure Code”. These normative acts originated a true auto-composition system in the national legal system, establishing various procedural guidelines. Among the innovations, is the preliminary conciliation/mediation hearing, foreseen in CPC/2015, which is mandatory. Therefore, the present work aims to analyze the current system of collaborative methods of conflict resolution, as well as the mandatory character of the conciliatory act at the beginning of the judicial process.
Type: Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso</description>
    <dc:date>2024-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/142">
    <title>A (des)judicialização da saúde pública no Rio Grande do Norte e a atuação da defensoria pública estadual - uma breve análise do sus mediado</title>
    <link>http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/142</link>
    <description>Título: A (des)judicialização da saúde pública no Rio Grande do Norte e a atuação da defensoria pública estadual - uma breve análise do sus mediado
Resumo: It is based on the performance of the Public Defender of the State of Rio Grande do Norte (DPE/RN) as institutional guarantor of the right to individual and collective health that this work is developed. There is a growing phenomenon of the Judicialization of Health, that is, the ever-increasing search for the realization of this right through legal bias, based on propositions of judicial demands and in opposition to incentive strategies to avoid the judiciary. At the same time, expose mediation as a viable instrument in achieving non-judicial access to health by citizens, despite still being little used, highlighting the SUS Mediated program – from DPE/RN. For this, bibliographical references were raised on the subject of judicialization of health, as well as a quantitative-descriptive field research was carried out in Vara Unica de Touros, in order to assess the real impact of this judicialization in the interior of the State of Rio Grande do Norte
Type: Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso</description>
    <dc:date>2023-06-30T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1486">
    <title>A negociação processual sob a ótica de atuação do ministério público</title>
    <link>http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1486</link>
    <description>Título: A negociação processual sob a ótica de atuação do ministério público
Resumo: The procedural juridical business along the lines established by the Code of &#xD;
Civil Procedure is relatively recent in the Brazilian legal system and, therefore, it is &#xD;
important to study the evolution of the self-regulation of the will, which allowed its &#xD;
incorporation into the procedural juridical relations through the principle of cooperation &#xD;
and due process. legal process. These changes implemented by the legislation &#xD;
enshrined the possibility that the parties could compromise and relax procedures, &#xD;
provided that they are within the limits set in the normative system itself. Thus, for the &#xD;
present discussion, the main objective is to elucidate the compatibility between the &#xD;
procedural negotiation and the performance of the Public Prosecution Service in the &#xD;
civil procedural area. Therefore, it is essential to understand the current classification &#xD;
intended by the legal system, as well as answer the questions about the acceptance &#xD;
process of the institute. From this point, it is worth mentioning the role of the Ministerial &#xD;
Body in the Brazilian procedural logic, as an autonomous and independent institution, &#xD;
essential to the jurisdictional function and guarantor of fundamental rights, but whose &#xD;
performance is limited by these same rights, whether performing the role of agent, or &#xD;
as intervener. After this explanation, the procedural legal relations in which the Public &#xD;
Prosecution is litigated are analyzed, especially regarding the limits to the ministerial &#xD;
procedural negotiation to the detriment of the unavailability of the rights defended by &#xD;
it, aspects on which the legislation and the homeland doctrine deal. Finally, we &#xD;
understand the scope of the recent rules and their dialogue and power of influence &#xD;
regarding the performance of parquet in the civil process.
Type: Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso</description>
    <dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1192">
    <title>Da audiência de conciliação e mediação: da prescindibilidade desse ato processual por ato voluntário de uma ou de ambas as partes</title>
    <link>http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1192</link>
    <description>Título: Da audiência de conciliação e mediação: da prescindibilidade desse ato processual por ato voluntário de uma ou de ambas as partes
Resumo: This document consists on a study turned to show that happened a correctness of the &#xD;
Legislative when it allowed, based on article 334, _ 4°, of the new Civil Process Code, that &#xD;
the parts choose premised on the conciliation audience and mediation event or not, bringing &#xD;
positive impacts which this recent change it's causing on processual area. The primordial &#xD;
escope its to reveal that the imposition of that audiences was delaying the processual &#xD;
resolution, at some cases, in reference to historical context that was created and it objectives, &#xD;
like it occurred in practice before that legal prediction; like it's happening in practice &#xD;
afterwards the changing to not obligatoriness; the related to principles basis to explain that &#xD;
modification; compared to Special Civil Judges, where the same still obligatory and the &#xD;
benefits for all involved parts on common procedement next to the new code come into force &#xD;
besides sugests some modifications to improve this legislative inovation. Finally, the actual &#xD;
article was constructed based on documental and bibliographic research, through legistation, &#xD;
books and juridical texts, where was searched to report the efficiency of beneficial possible &#xD;
results of the not obligatoriness of those audiences to the promptness of procedual protocol, &#xD;
what possibly neither will turn on decrease of the exorbitant process amount in progress and &#xD;
the judiciary power cost, which is, economy to public coffers and, the most important, will &#xD;
establish the compromise provided by Federal Constitution with reasonable process time. This &#xD;
research predicated on the premise that the consiliation and mediation audience it's just an &#xD;
efficient instrument when parts have interests on talking and achieve consensus not only just &#xD;
by legal imposition. The approach method used it's the deductive one, and it techniques of &#xD;
used researches are bibliographic and doctrinaire.
Type: Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso</description>
    <dc:date>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

