http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/604 2026-04-25T10:21:30Z http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1493 Título: Discurso religioso como projeto político do chefe do poder executivo: exercício à liberdade de expressão ou afronta ao estado laico? Resumo: The scope of the present work is to verify if the religious discourses used by the heads of the executive branch as a political project fall within the fundamental right to religious freedom or in patent affront to the Secular State. In this sense, the objective pursued is to determine whether state secularity is properly fulfilled in political rhetoric, considering the vertiginous rise of Christian religious discourses in national politics. The deductive method is used, analyzing the theme based on the general rule for specific cases. The hypothesis defended consists of the notion that the candidate for an elective mandate and, consequently, the political representative is not constitutionally legitimate to carry out his campaign, as well as to exercise his mandate with a speech / argument that favors a certain religion. At first, the historical roots of the relationship between the state and religion and the consequences that reverberate around the world are analyzed. The association between State and religion in Brazil is the result of a long process that has followed the country's history since the 16th century. In many moments in history, the Church has functioned as an instrument of social, political and cultural domination. Subsequently, religious freedom is widely explored, from its concept and characteristics to national and international standards that are intended for its protection. The Secular State is then approached under the bias of John Rawls, Jurgen Habermas, Chantal Mouffe and Marcelo Neves. It addresses the process of secularization arising from modernization and the understanding of the secularity theoretically enshrined in the Federal Constitution and its practical effectiveness. In the last chapter the discursive theory is thoroughly investigated under the approaches of Michel Foucault, Michel Pêcheux, Jugen Habermas, Chantal Mouffe and Laclau in order to identify whether the speeches given in the political arena when delivered by the elective mandate holders need to conform to the principle of state secularism. The legitimacy of the religious speeches made by candidates and those with an elective mandate to the head of the executive in the three federative spheres in relation to the principles of religious freedom, state secularism and the democratic regime itself is analyzed and presents the conclusions about the hypothesis raised, risks arising from linking religion and politics. Type: Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso 2020-01-01T00:00:00Z http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/605 Título: Políticas públicas enquanto mecanismo de concretização de direitos sociais Resumo: Social rights represent an attempt by the Brazilian constituent of 1988 to guide the country towards achieving economic development and reducing social inequalities. The discussion about the effectiveness of these rights is at the center of the legal debate, which is why the theme chosen for this work is: public policies as a mechanism for realizing social rights. Thus, the research objectives are to present the bases of Brazilian neoconstitutionalism and the constitutionalization of public policies; study the constitutionalist doctrine on social rights; and understand public policies as a mechanism for realizing social rights. Therefore, the deductive method of scientific approach was chosen, with a dogmatic approach to law, based on an exploratory, bibliographical, documental and qualitative research. In conclusion, it is inferred that, given the constitutionalization of law and the supremacy of the Constitution, as well as the implementation of democratic, liberal and social values, it is possible to note that the materialization of rights in life in society, through the law itself, ends up bumping into the limit of how much the law can provide. In this context, it is understood that the provisional nature of social rights does not deprive them of their full and immediate effectiveness, which is why the constitutional text, directly or indirectly, guarantees society the right to demand compliance, either administratively or judicially. In this way, public policies find their raison in the materialization of social rights, through a state action plan and a positive action by the state which, in turn, requires means and resources to be effective. As for the required resources, the Constitution itself not only establishes the rights to be guaranteed, but also establishes rules for directing resources with a view to making social policies viable. In addition, in order to define a legal concept of public policies, the present work embraces the idea that public policies are government action programs aimed at coordinating the means available to the State and private activities, in order to achieve socially relevant objectives and politically determined, which have their own elements and methodology for their analysis, implementation and evaluation. Finally, the limits to the requirement of social rights and their respective policies in the Judiciary were analyzed, whose conclusion points to the fact that all constituted powers have attributions and important roles, defined constitutionally and in the cycle of public policies, able to be respected and improved. Type: Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso 2023-09-15T00:00:00Z