<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Repositório Colecção:</title>
    <link>http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/23</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 08:19:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-05-03T08:19:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>A negociação processual sob a ótica de atuação do ministério público</title>
      <link>http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1486</link>
      <description>Título: A negociação processual sob a ótica de atuação do ministério público
Resumo: The procedural juridical business along the lines established by the Code of &#xD;
Civil Procedure is relatively recent in the Brazilian legal system and, therefore, it is &#xD;
important to study the evolution of the self-regulation of the will, which allowed its &#xD;
incorporation into the procedural juridical relations through the principle of cooperation &#xD;
and due process. legal process. These changes implemented by the legislation &#xD;
enshrined the possibility that the parties could compromise and relax procedures, &#xD;
provided that they are within the limits set in the normative system itself. Thus, for the &#xD;
present discussion, the main objective is to elucidate the compatibility between the &#xD;
procedural negotiation and the performance of the Public Prosecution Service in the &#xD;
civil procedural area. Therefore, it is essential to understand the current classification &#xD;
intended by the legal system, as well as answer the questions about the acceptance &#xD;
process of the institute. From this point, it is worth mentioning the role of the Ministerial &#xD;
Body in the Brazilian procedural logic, as an autonomous and independent institution, &#xD;
essential to the jurisdictional function and guarantor of fundamental rights, but whose &#xD;
performance is limited by these same rights, whether performing the role of agent, or &#xD;
as intervener. After this explanation, the procedural legal relations in which the Public &#xD;
Prosecution is litigated are analyzed, especially regarding the limits to the ministerial &#xD;
procedural negotiation to the detriment of the unavailability of the rights defended by &#xD;
it, aspects on which the legislation and the homeland doctrine deal. Finally, we &#xD;
understand the scope of the recent rules and their dialogue and power of influence &#xD;
regarding the performance of parquet in the civil process.
Type: Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jan 2020 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1486</guid>
      <dc:date>2020-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Da audiência de conciliação e mediação: da prescindibilidade desse ato processual por ato voluntário de uma ou de ambas as partes</title>
      <link>http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1192</link>
      <description>Título: Da audiência de conciliação e mediação: da prescindibilidade desse ato processual por ato voluntário de uma ou de ambas as partes
Resumo: This document consists on a study turned to show that happened a correctness of the &#xD;
Legislative when it allowed, based on article 334, _ 4°, of the new Civil Process Code, that &#xD;
the parts choose premised on the conciliation audience and mediation event or not, bringing &#xD;
positive impacts which this recent change it's causing on processual area. The primordial &#xD;
escope its to reveal that the imposition of that audiences was delaying the processual &#xD;
resolution, at some cases, in reference to historical context that was created and it objectives, &#xD;
like it occurred in practice before that legal prediction; like it's happening in practice &#xD;
afterwards the changing to not obligatoriness; the related to principles basis to explain that &#xD;
modification; compared to Special Civil Judges, where the same still obligatory and the &#xD;
benefits for all involved parts on common procedement next to the new code come into force &#xD;
besides sugests some modifications to improve this legislative inovation. Finally, the actual &#xD;
article was constructed based on documental and bibliographic research, through legistation, &#xD;
books and juridical texts, where was searched to report the efficiency of beneficial possible &#xD;
results of the not obligatoriness of those audiences to the promptness of procedual protocol, &#xD;
what possibly neither will turn on decrease of the exorbitant process amount in progress and &#xD;
the judiciary power cost, which is, economy to public coffers and, the most important, will &#xD;
establish the compromise provided by Federal Constitution with reasonable process time. This &#xD;
research predicated on the premise that the consiliation and mediation audience it's just an &#xD;
efficient instrument when parts have interests on talking and achieve consensus not only just &#xD;
by legal imposition. The approach method used it's the deductive one, and it techniques of &#xD;
used researches are bibliographic and doctrinaire.
Type: Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1192</guid>
      <dc:date>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A ação de exigir contas e seu cabimento em sede de pensão alimentícia à luz do novo CPC</title>
      <link>http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1191</link>
      <description>Título: A ação de exigir contas e seu cabimento em sede de pensão alimentícia à luz do novo CPC
Resumo: This work has the objective to explain the modifications newly brought &#xD;
to the Brazilian law in observance to the social alterations that arose and, &#xD;
because of that, the need for the law to better adequate towards the new social &#xD;
anxieties. Then, in a inductive way, it could be detached the newly brought &#xD;
changes deriving from the ordinary law 13.058/14 and the new civil process &#xD;
code, apart from the civil law institutes such as the custody and the alimony for &#xD;
child’s maintenance. Directed by that, it was necessary to consolidate and &#xD;
therefore detach the viability of the processual instrument of the action to &#xD;
require accounts as part of the family power and, onto that, its legitimacy or who &#xD;
would be legitimate to exercise that right, always in mind for the best interest of &#xD;
the child and for that using the historical-juridical bibliography altogether with &#xD;
the jurisprudential thesis that were adopted on the Brazilian rights on their &#xD;
superior courts.
Type: Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1191</guid>
      <dc:date>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Realização de negócios jurídicos processuais pela fazenda pública: precedentes judiciais vinculantes e isonomia</title>
      <link>http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1190</link>
      <description>Título: Realização de negócios jurídicos processuais pela fazenda pública: precedentes judiciais vinculantes e isonomia
Resumo: The 2015 Code of Civil Procedure established a new scenario in view of the &#xD;
possibility of carrying out procedural legal acts, by providing in its article 190 to its general &#xD;
clause. Consequently, since the Government has a large number of judicial demands, it &#xD;
is advisable to investigate the influence of such innovation in the Public Administration. &#xD;
The present research aims to investigate whether the procedural legal acts conducted &#xD;
between the Public Treasure and administrators generate binding judicial precedents that, &#xD;
in the future, under similar circumstances, it would have the power to impose a similar &#xD;
procedural agreement to the Government. The principle of isonomy is one of the essential &#xD;
axes of this study, as it is strongly present in the constitutional text, as well as in &#xD;
Administrative and Civil Procedural Law, imposing equal treatment on the partitions. It is &#xD;
in honor of the principle of equality that the application of judicial precedents arising from &#xD;
the conclusion of procedural legal acts between the Public Treasure and the administrated &#xD;
ones is defended. This monographic work also contemplates the determination of which &#xD;
procedural instrument would be more applicable for provoking the Judiciary, by the &#xD;
administration, in a situation in which there is a binding judicial precedent over procedural &#xD;
legal acts carried out by the public entity, but it refuses, unjustifiably applying it, even &#xD;
though all the necessary requirements for its application coexist.
Type: Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2019 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://repositorio.unirn.edu.br/jspui/handle/123456789/1190</guid>
      <dc:date>2019-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

