Convenções processuais em sede de termo de ajustamento de conduta (TAC)

Abstract

An analysis is made of the importance of the Public Prosecutor's Office anticipating the potential process in terms of conduct adjustment. The purpose of the institute is discussed, highlighting the limits and the need for training in order to take better advantage of the pre-procedural institute, as well as the presentation of part of the negotiation options present in the legal system when the matter is the custody of collective interests. The procedural institute has been highlighted as a mechanism capable of crowning, once and for all, the instrumentalist phase of the process, the need for protagonism of the parties still in the extrajudicial sphere, as well as the importance of the institute as an element that can make up for the slowness of the legislative process, in predicting new legal situations, as a result of the enormous variety of concrete cases that exist.